Kickstarter credibility

Just before Kickstater suspended our project The Quest: Rise of Emodo, we doubted already of how their algorithms works, if they have one. If you take a close look on some projects, it just doesn't make any sense how some projects have better ratings then others and how some become popular and others don't. It seems someone is picking which projects deserves to be successful to be funded or not.
Our project was suspended 15h03m before its end, it was going well for 41 days until kickstarter took the decision to suspend our project. Kickstarter credibility is low.

We have discovered that Kickstarter broke their own rules on Wednesday by charging a card BEFORE the campaign was fully funded. That's two days before the campaign was suppose to end!

They're policy of no comments on suspended projects is like a dictatorship. In a democracy, people have a right to know what went wrong with they're projects. Where is your credibility Kickstarter?

Maybe nothing is wrong and Kickstarter is just using some project creators, using they're suspensions as a marketing kit saying, *your project is suspended because we care*. Well not every project is a scam, eventually all projects are reviewed before they go live. 
If a project is suspended, then is Kickstarter Staff fault for not doing well their job and letting a project going live and then after near the end, eventually with no known reason its dictator simply says suspend it.
Marketing a project takes time and effort by the project creators, and this is a free marketing for Kickstarter.